Proportional Representation Compared to First Past The Post

 

88% of Canadian electoral experts recommend Proportional Representation over First-Past-The-Post.

Law Commission of Canada: Our old voting system “favours an adversarial style of politics” and “is more likely to frustrate or distort the wishes of the voters than to translate them fairly into representation and influence in the legislature.” “Citizens want to have a real voice in decision making, and would like to see more responsive, accountable, and effective political institutions.” The Law Commission’s 2004 report recommended a switch to proportional representation, as have more than a dozen similar government-sponsored studies.

Opponents of pro rep never argue that it isn’t at least as fair as our old First Past The Post voting system. They do argue about its practical effects, for example saying it is “The perfect platform for extremist parties.” “Extremist parties” in B.C. are any small challengers – under the Socreds the extremists were considered to be the BC New Democrats, BC Greens and BC Liberals. Meanwhile, FPTP produces “moderates” like Donald Trump.

Fact: Pro rep simply accurately reflects whatever the voters choose. Opponents in whatever party are the old hacks who are still dreaming of getting 100% of the power with 40% of the vote, and following tradition, will say almost anything to get it.

There will be three kinds of proportional voting systems on the referendum ballot, for those voters who wish to express a preference among them, although it’s not necessary to do so. There are good brief descriptions available. In each of them, MLAs are elected. None are appointed by political parties as opponents have been accusing.

Dual-Member-Proportional Explained

Rural-Urban Proportional Explained

Mixed Member Proportional Explained  (Surveys indicate MMP is the leading contender.)

The NDP have promised on their official website that should Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) win the referendum, it will be a version (called “open-list”) in which the voters, not political parties, choose the list candidates.

An example of this is the German province of Baden-Württemberg, where voters simply vote for one candidate and this vote is used both for the local and regional candidate elections.

Another version of MMP gives the voters two votes, one for the local candidate and one for the regional candidate. An example of this is the German province of Bavaria (which uses a semi-open-list arrangement, but B.C. would presumably have a fully open list).

Facebook share button