Proportional Representation Compared to First Past The Post

 

Pro Rep is well regarded by experts: More than three out of four Canadian professors with expertise in electoral systems recommended Proportional Representation over First-Past-The-Post to the federal Special Committee on Electoral Reform in 2016.

 

Law Commission of Canada: Our old voting system “favours an adversarial style of politics” and “is more likely to frustrate or distort the wishes of the voters than to translate them fairly into representation and influence in the legislature.” “Citizens want to have a real voice in decision making, and would like to see more responsive, accountable, and effective political institutions.” The Law Commission’s 2004 report recommended a switch to proportional representation, as have more than a dozen similar government-sponsored studies.

 

Opponents of pro rep never argue that it isn’t at least as fair as our old First Past The Post voting system. They do argue about its practical effects, for example saying it is “The perfect platform for extremist parties.” “Extremist parties” in B.C. are any small challengers – under the Socreds the extremists were considered to be the BC New Democrats, BC Greens and BC Liberals. Meanwhile, FPTP produces “moderates” like Donald Trump.

Fact: Pro rep simply accurately reflects whatever the voters choose. Opponents in whatever party are the old hacks who are still dreaming of getting 100% of the power with 40% of the vote, and following tradition, will say almost anything to get it.

There are three kinds of proportional voting systems to choose from on the referendum ballot. There are brief descriptions of these voting systems at Voting Systems as Gardening. For more details see:

Dual-Member-Proportional Explained

Rural-Urban Proportional Explained

Mixed Member Proportional Explained  (Surveys indicate MMP is the leading contender.)

In none of these voting systems are any MLAs appointed by political parties as opponents have been advertising.

The NDP have promised on their official website that should Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) win the referendum, it will be a version (called “open-list”) in which the voters, not political parties, choose the list candidates. The premier of British Columbia confirmed this again Nov. 14th  (https://vancouversun.com/news/politics/b-c-premier-to-veto-closed-list-version-of-mixed-member-pro-rep)

An example of this is the German province of Baden-Württemberg, where voters simply vote for one candidate and this vote is used both for the local and regional candidate elections.

Another version of MMP gives the voters two votes, one for the local candidate and one for the regional candidate. An example of this is the German province of Bavaria (which uses a semi-open-list arrangement, but B.C. would presumably have a fully open list).

Facebook share button

Home (Highlights) | Quick Guide to Voting | Voting Systems as Gardening | Pro Rep vs FPTP: Intro. | 17 Benefits of First-Past-The-Post | Economy, Stability, etc. | Voter Turnout | Simpler Voting | Better Politicians?! | True Majority Rule | Regional Representation | Questions and Answers | VIDEOS | About VotingBC

Authorized by Committee for Voting Equity in BC (VotingBC), registered sponsor, Chair Maxwell Anderson, 3137 42 Ave W, Vancouver BC, V6N 3H1.